Tuesday 26 February 2013

Daily Mail 2 Lizzie Miller


The spare tyre that started a revolution: Model Lizzie Miller on the 'embarrassing' picture that made her a star 

By LYDIA SLATER
When Lizzie Miller saw the photograph that would make her famous, she felt embarrassed. The picture — which appeared in Glamour magazine in the U.S. a year ago — showed her stretch marks and a roll of soft tummy flesh. 
‘I said to myself: ‘‘OK, it’s not the best picture, but it’s not a big deal. And ­anyway, nobody’s going to see it.’’ Famous last words!’ 
But that photograph, ­buried in the back of the magazine, generated a global media frenzy and turned her into a supermodel.
Celebrating her curves: Model Lizzie Miller reveals her stretch marks and a roll of tummy flesh in that Glamour magazine photo
Celebrating her curves: Model Lizzie Miller reveals her stretch marks and a roll of tummy flesh in that Glamour magazine photo which generated a media frenzy
Hundreds of emails and letters poured in from women overwhelmed with joy at ­seeing a normal body in a magazine.
‘Seeing someone not airbrushed, with an average looking body, compared to all those stick-thin pictures of perfection — I guess people thought: ‘‘Wow! This girl looks like me,’’ ’ says Lizzie.
‘It really struck a chord. The work flooded in, with lucrative contracts with American and Italian fashion labels.’ 
 
Ironically, it was the public reaction that helped Lizzie finally accept her own body in all its curvy glory.
‘The part of myself I was most ­insecure about was my stomach,’ she says. ‘My weight has been an issue I’ve ­struggled with all my life. But the response I got made me realise other people out there felt like me.
‘One girl wrote to me to say her sister had told her she was fat and ugly all her life. Now, when she feels bad about herself, she goes to her ­computer, looks at a picture of me and she feels better. 
‘As I read what she had written, I started crying — I felt so sorry for her. Knowing I could help her feel better about herself is so rewarding to me.’
'It's crazy that fashion recognises only one body type': The 21-year-old, who is a British size 14 to 16, in a recent shoot
'It's crazy that fashion recognises only one body type': The 21-year-old, who is a British size 14 to 16, in a recent shoot
A year on and the rever­berations are continuing. Chanel cast plus-size model Crystal Renn in its Cruise 2011 show, and there have been fashion magazine issues ­dedicated to larger sizes, including ­V Magazine’s Size issue and Vogue Curvy. 
Essentials has announced it will no longer feature celebrities or ­models on its cover after a survey of readers ­suggested they preferred ‘real women’. 
And when luscious Mad Men actress Christina Hendricks revealed that ­designers refused to loan her clothes because of her size, it unleashed a storm of protest.
‘The designers are going to have to take notice. After all, curvy women have money, too,’ says Lizzie. ‘We want to wear fashionable clothes.’
I met Lizzie, 21, at the offices of her Manhattan modelling agency, ­Wilhelmina. Articulate and thoughtful, she is also a knockout — a tawny-skinned, athletic blonde who at 5ft 11in measures 38-32-42 and is a British size 14 to 16.
BIG CHANGE
The waistline of the average woman has expanded by six inches since the Fifties
She eats well, exercises daily and, at 12½  st, her body mass index is in the healthy range. Only in the warped world of fashion could she have been considered too large. 
‘When I started ­modelling eight years ago, plus-size clothes were shapeless potato sacks,’ she says. 
‘Designers were trying to hide the ­figure because they didn’t know what to do with it. Now, it is better tailored. It’s baby steps, but I think that’s how you make progress.’ 
Lizzie is happy to be the poster girl for a more realistic portrayal of women in the fashion media. But it wasn’t that long ago that she was too self-conscious to wear dresses or shorts. As a child in San Jose, ­California, she was teased at school. 
‘Obesity runs in my family, so I have that genetic thing to battle against,’ she says. ‘When I was ­little, my mum used to call me her ‘‘solid chocolate bunny’’.
‘I’ve never been a thin girl and I didn’t eat healthily. Every day after school, I would get a bag of Doritos and three Ferrero Rocher chocolates. I ate a lot of cheeseburgers and not enough vegetables.’ 
As a result, aged 12, she weighed more than she does now.
‘I was known as the funny, fat one at school. One guy emailed me a picture in which he’d drawn purple stretch marks all over it. That was really hurtful.
Curves on display: Plus-size model Crystal Renn on the runway at Zac Posen's show Left) and Mad Men actress Christina Hendricks on the red carpet
Christina Hendricks
Big issue: Crystal Renn (left) and Christina Hendricks (right)
'He also told me that when I wore shorts, people would have to look away in disgust because my legs were so ugly. 
‘When I sprained my ankle, he told me another guy had said it was because I was too fat to support myself.’
Until a couple of years ago, Lizzie says she would still hear his voice taunting her every time she showed her legs in public.
‘If guys looked at me in the street, I’d never think they were checking me out — I’d assume they were looking at how fat my legs were. Just a couple of cutting ­comments had an impact on me for years afterwards.’ 
Eventually, her parents went round to the bully’s family to explain what was going on, and the teasing stopped. Lizzie decided to take her weight under control. 
‘When I was 12, I remember ­thinking: “Wow! At this rate, I’m going to be enormous by the time I get to high school.” I didn’t want to be known as the fat girl any more — I wanted people to see me, rather than just my body.’
'I was known as the funny, fat one at school. One guy emailed me a picture in which he’d drawn purple stretch marks all over it. That was really hurtful'
So she and her parents joined WeightWatchers and Lizzie shed four stone merely by eating more healthily. As her weight came off, other people started to notice her looks.
‘People came up to me all the time to ask if I was a model,’ she says. ‘I ­wondered if I should try it, but I never thought I could because I wasn’t super-skinny.’
Then she heard about a casting call for a model search and ­persuaded her parents to let her attend. Several agencies expressed an interest and, aged 13, Lizzie signed up with Wilhelmina, which has a plus-size division. 
She has seen the pressures on models to fit an unrealistic ideal body type. ‘When I moved to New York, I used to live in an apartment with other models. One girl arrived who’d been working in Japan, where you’re expected to be even skinnier than in the West, and she was clearly anorexic. 
‘She’d run for two or three hours a day, and even when we were watching TV, she couldn’t sit still — she’d be doing crunches or leg lifts. She ate only tiny amounts.’ 
Lizzie lays the blame for this on a fashion industry that worships skinniness. ‘My room-mate is a model who is naturally thin,’ she says. ‘But there are so many other girls who are bigger than me. 
‘It’s crazy that fashion ­recognises only one body type and if you don’t fit it, you’re considered fat.’ 
No wonder that a study in 2007 by the University of Missouri found that women felt worse about themselves after looking at pictures of models in magazine adverts for just three minutes. 
‘We need to be celebrating skinny girls, curvy girls, tall girls, short girls, black girls, Asian girls and all nationalities,’ says Lizzie. 
‘I think that would make women feel a lot better about themselves. We have a long way to go until a girl who’s curvy can be in a magazine without a lot of attention being drawn to her.’



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1313462/Plus-size-model-Lizzie-Miller-embarrassing-picture-star.html#ixzz2M1Awn8hz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Daily Mail Lizzie Miller


he wobbly bits that shook the world: The joyous support created by one model's picture (flabby tummy and all)

By LINDA KELSEY
At first glance it's just the kind of playful picture your boyfriend might snap of you, caught unawares on a lazy Sunday morning. The subject looks glowing, happy, natural, totally at ease with her body and herself.
But something is awry. Something that causes you to do a double-take. Especially given that this photo has just appeared in a glossy magazine. By now, I bet you've spotted it. What I am referring to is the small roll of fat around the middle of this 20-year-old model. 
It might be a tiny imperfection, but when it was published in the American edition of Glamour magazine, it appeared amid hundreds of pages of adverts and fashion shots in which the models have no blemishes, no frown lines, no wrinkles and certainly no body fat. 
Lizzie Miller
Defying convention: Lizzie Miller's tummy has featured as a story on America's morning TV programme Today, one of the most-watched shows in the country
So what impact did this little mound of flesh have? Were women disgusted that such an offensive thing should be displayed in public?
Well, even though it was only 3in square and hidden away on page 194, this extraordinary image of a woman with wobbly bits that have not been airbrushed away has sparked a whirlwind of reaction - almost all of it positive.
Hundreds of readers flooded the magazine's website the moment after the image first appeared, roaring their approval and appreciation with comments like: 'I love this picture. I was starting to despair of ever seeing real women in magazines and it made me reassess how I look at myself. I have a similar tummy which I hate - but look at her, she's beautiful.' 
lizzie-miller
Groundbreaking: Lizzie -who is 5ft 11in and 121/2st - is considered too big to model even plus-size lines
Such was the excitement that Lizzie Miller's tummy featured as a story on America's morning TV programme Today, one of the most-watched shows in the country.
Now Glamour is planning a follow-up feature in November's issue which will include more shots of Miller.
Many of the women who spoke out in support of the image were horrified that professional Lizzie - who is 5ft 11in and 121/2st - is considered too big to model even plus-size lines.
Jamie Lee Curtis
Brave stand: Jamie Lee Curtis showed the nation even Hollywood celebrities have lumps and bumps
Having been rejected as too big, she said the reaction to her picture proves 'that the world is hungry to see pictures of normal women'. She's so right.
What also gives this image such sledgehammer power is that it's not her breasts or her upper arms or her thighs that draw the eye immediately, but the stomach - the area of every woman's body that inspires more agonies of self-loathing than any other.
You might be a mother who, however hard you try, simply cannot shift what has cruelly been dubbed the 'mummy tummy'. Or you might be a young woman who likes a glass of wine and is paying the price with a bulging midriff that just never responds to sit-ups.
Of course, when we dress up to go out we can always rely on one variety or another of Bridget Jones's big hold-em-in pants. But when we are naked in front of the mirror, there is no disguising a sagging tummy. That's why it's so groundbreaking to see a beautiful woman who is a model, even if a curvy one, willing to reveal that she, too, has the same imperfections as the rest of us.
In its way, this picture has as much power to shock as the photograph of actress Jamie Lee Curtis, who seven years ago stripped to her underwear at 43 - without the aid of an airbrush - to prove that even a woman who was once Hollywood's pin-up girl had matured to have as many lumps and bumps as the rest of us.
When I was editing SHE magazine in the early Nineties, we decided to produce a special 'Big is Beautiful' issue. We ran a competition to award a modelling contract to a size 14-plus model, and featured women naked who were far larger than Lizzie Miller. We also ran a picture of the famously fat Dawn French on the cover, showing off her considerable decolletage in a knockout vermilion Vivienne Westwood dress.
That issue of the magazine flew off the shelves to become a complete sell-out, the fastest and highest-selling issue in the six years I was editor.
I made a vow from then on to feature women of all shapes and sizes, and not just in specially flagged-up features. I thought that perhaps in the dozen years since I stopped editing glossy magazines things would have changed. 
I hoped that, along with reality television and an appetite for real-life stories of every hue, real-life women with real-life bodies might begin to appear in other glossy magazines and across the media. 
Chanel
Airbrushed: Keira Knightley's breasts have suddenly acquired a bigger cup size in the new Chanel ad, and everyone is talking about her breasts as if they own them
AT A GLANCE...
  • 8 per cent of women have a classic hourglass figure
  • 34in is the typical British woman's waist. In the Fifties, it was 27.5in
  • 20 per cent of women are pear-shaped
But what seems to have happened is quite the reverse. Just look at Sophie Dahl, who arrived like a blazing comet on the fashion scene as a gloriously sensual size 14, but who then began to shrink before our very eyes until she was wafer thin, presumably because she was constantly surrounded by images of female perfection.
And if models and celebrities are not actually perfect, they sure as hell will be by the time their images appear on the newsstands.
As Lizzie Miller herself has said: 'Pretty much every picture in a magazine or ad is airbrushed . . . I don't think the public understands how much smoke and mirrors are involved in making women look like that.' 
 
On this last point, I think Lizzie is wrong. Almost everyone these days is aware that photographs are re-touched. Kate Winslet went public about her thighs when they were airbrushed almost to the point of disappearing altogether when she appeared on the cover of GQ. 
Keira Knightley's breasts have suddenly acquired a bigger cup size in the new Chanel ad, and everyone is talking about her breasts as if they own them.
But even if we are aware of what goes on in the world of showbiz and fashion, that doesn't mean we should be blase about it, or pretend it has nothing to do with us. Being bombarded with perfect images everywhere just makes us despair all the more about our imperfect bodies.
Dove
Real women: The only genuine media breakthrough in recent years as far as the portrayal of real women is concerned has been the Dove Campaign
If all those celebrities, with their personal trainers, personal nutritionists, personal stylists, hairdressers and make-up artists, world-class photographers and expert lighting, can't be seen in pictures without being airbrushed, what might the rest of us need before being deemed acceptable to be seen in public? A full body transplant, perhaps.
The only genuine media breakthrough in recent years as far as the portrayal of real women is concerned has been the Dove Campaign For Real Beauty, featuring women of all ages, shapes and sizes. 
Not only did women respond well to it, Unilever was canny enough to make the campaign ongoing. Never mind that it's all part of its brand-boosting campaign to sell more products, The Dove Self-Esteem Fund, which provides teachers with educational tools to include body awareness seminars within schools, is at least a stab at raising the issues involved.
Even Alexandra Shulman, the editor of British Vogue, entered the fray recently when she criticised prominent fashion designers for encouraging Size Zero models by sending out tiny clothes for fashion shoots.
In an open letter, she wrote: 'We have now reached the point where many of the sample sizes don't comfortably fit the established star models.'
She also pointed to the trend for 'jutting bones and no breasts or hips' and how such body shapes are a result of the 'minuscule' pieces of clothing supplied to the magazine for photo shoots. 
Vogue is regularly re-touching photos to make the models look larger, she told the designers. But how much larger, I wonder. From a Size Zero to a size 2 or 4 perhaps? Almost even up to Kate Moss's 'gigantic' proportions? The trouble is, when you're talking about Vogue, it's all relative isn't it? In high-end magazines like that, you will rarely see anything so provocative as this new picture of Lizzie Miller.
Susie Orbach, author of Fat Is A Feminist Issue and, more recently, Bodies, says she sees far more people in her psychotherapy practice than she used to who are unhappy about their bodies - presumably because of the intense pressures they feel from the media to be perfect. 
'Bodies are becoming part of our personal mission to tame, extend and perfect,' she writes. That's why she's not surprised that eating disorders, self-harm and a general feeling of being cheated out of the body we want are all on the increase.
'Body shame,' Orbach says, has gone global, and she cites the example of South Korea, where 50 per cent of young women are having surgery to give them 'Western' eyelids.
Chinese girls, in the meantime, are having rods inserted in their legs to make them taller, and Tehran in Iran has 3,000 surgeons specialising in nose jobs. 'The body has become a casing for fantasy,' says Orbach, 'rather than a place from which to live.'
It's taken me 56 years to become reasonably comfortable with the body nature gave me. To my self-critical eye my breasts have always been too small, my bottom too big, my knees too fat.

Who knew?

Islands in the South Pacific, including Nauru, Tonga and Micronesia, top the list of countries with the greatest percentage of overweight adults - a portly 90 per cent

Illnesses have taken me to a level of skinniness which horrified me, but as soon as the weight has come back on I've begun to feel discontent again with what I've got, pinching disconsolately at myself, castigating myself for not watching the levels of cholesterol in my diet or going to the gym.
In the past six months I've put on about 12lb and my washboard stomach is now a small mound - rather like Lizzie Miller's, in fact.
I know why I've put on weight - it's because I'm happier and more relaxed than I've been for a long while. Nevertheless, I told my boyfriend I needed to lose a few pounds. He told me I could do with just a few pounds more and that it was good to see me looking like a woman rather than a boy.
At this stage in my life, I hope I have the wisdom to know that he's right and that I will never, and should never, look like the models I see in fashion magazines. But it's so hard not to feel inferior, undesirable, in comparison. 
It's ironic when you think about it that mostly it's not men who make us paranoid about our bodies - they often don't even notice imperfections that we agonise over for years. It's the magazines for sure that chip away at self-esteem.
Perhaps one small picture of lovely Lizzie Miller and her little pot belly - just like the women currently prancing in all their variety around the London stage in Calendar Girls - isn't going to make much of a difference to this chronic and complex condition of female body dissatisfaction.
But it's a step in the right direction. Unless we start addressing the issues, unless we wise up to the fact that our body fantasies can never be fulfilled, we'll continue to be pointlessly unhappy for a long time to come.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1210814/Lizzie-Millers-Glamour-magazine-shoot-How-models-picture-shook-world-flabby-tummy-all.html#ixzz2M1A1QCSL
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Lizzie Miller- Glamour magazine THE GUARDIAN


Too fat to be a model? The picture that caused a storm in the fashion world

Lizzie Miller is considered too large to model plus-size clothes. Is the reaction that followed the publication of this picture going to change that?
lizzie miller
Lizzie Miller photographed by Walter Chin as pictured in the September issue of US Glamour Photograph: Walter Chin/Glamour
'It's a photo that measures all of three by three inches," gushes Cindi Leive, editor of US Glamour in a post on the magazine's blog, "but the letters about it started to flood my inbox literally the day Glamour hit newsstands." The picture in question, illustrating a story about body confidence, has generated more than 700 comments on the site, and featured on the US Today morning TV programme. What does it show? A beautiful, creamy-skinned naked model . . . with a small roll of stomach fat.
Lizzie Miller, the 20-year-old model in question, agrees that it's astonishing that, at 5ft 11in and 12.5 stone she's considered a "plus size" model. "It's sad," she says. "In the industry anything over size six is considered a plus-size." Miller, who is around a US size 12-14 (that is, either average or slightly below average) lost about 60lb when she was 13 but today she is considered too large to model for plus-size lines Marina Rinaldi (she says, "they like girls who are an 8-10") or Elena Miro. She says that the overwhelming reaction to the tiny photograph, buried on page 194 of Glamour magazine "shows that the world is hungry to see pictures of normal women."
One wouldn't have thought this would be news. As Miller says, "pretty much every picture in a magazine or ad is airbrushed . . . I don't think the public understands how much smoke and mirrors are involved in making women look like that."

So does the reaction to this picture mean that the tide is turning? Hardly. Even after the deluge of emails, Leive hasn't made a commitment to using average-sized women in fashion shoots, saying only that the magazine wants to celebrate "all kinds of beauty". The outcome for Miller, though, has been more positive. She has received more offers of work since the picture was published. And her model agency, Wilhelmina, has told her that she mustn't lose any weight.



Sources: